If the sims 1 works on my pc shud the sims 2 work??

Asked at 16:07 on Friday 19 August 2005 by craig (craig_bob)

Report this Question

The Sims 1 is older so it can work on older machines.
The Sims 2 is newer and some older machines don't have the new requirements for the game.

That's what my suggesting is.

Answered at 17:44 on Friday 19 August 2005 by Brad (scitama) Answer Rating: Not Rated Yet.

Report this Answer

ok thanks.

Answered at 17:51 on Friday 19 August 2005 by craig (craig_bob) Answer Rating: Not Rated Yet.

Report this Answer

Not sure, but sims 1 and 2 are totally different, and sims 2 takes up more space then sims 1.

Answered at 01:23 on Saturday 20 August 2005 by Rae1 Answer Rating: Not Rated Yet.

Report this Answer

check the bottom or side of sims2 box. It will have the minimum required system assets (equipment) that the game requires to operate. If you know what your computer has match these values. If Sims 2 requires higher level equipment and resources then you have on your computer it may refuse to install to your machine all together.

Answered at 12:42 on Friday 7 October 2005 by Patrick Wolf (traveller) Answer Rating: Not Rated Yet.

Report this Answer

The sims 2 is very annoying because it needs seriously high requirements. My processor and graphics card can't keep up with the darn thing. It usually needs about 3GB free hard disk space and about a 2.0 GHZ processor. I don't rightly know though, look on the back of the Sims 2 case and it will tell you.

Answered at 21:53 on Wednesday 22 March 2006 by Akimi Saruwatari (cooliekitty) Answer Rating: Not Rated Yet.

Report this Answer

an interesting impact on the search engine wars.Google and MSN are trying to position themselves to dominate online search. The situation boils down as follows: Google is the king, MSN wants to be it. This situation takes on particularly interesting impact when one considers that Google now supplies ads and and <h4>Cheap Monster Beats Headphones</h4> and search results to AOL. In doing so, Google derives roughly 10 percent of its revenues from the AOL relationship.In the summer of 2005, rumors started that AOL was for sale. MSN and Google were obvious buyers. The only problem was both companies realized AOL was a good short term
but a terrible long term one given the death of dial-up modem systems. So who would buy AOL and how much would they be willing to pay? Would Google let MSN swipe 10 percent of its business? If so, how high could Google drive up the price of AOL for for beats by dre studio headphones for MSN?Google Makes Major MistakeIf rumors are to be believed, MSN and Time Warner have reached a deal on the AOL platform. So, how much will MSN pay Time Warner for AOL?Nothing. Not one penny.By the end of December 2005, MSN and Time Warner are expected to announce a partnership
the two companies will intertwine their Internet units and pursue joint advertising efforts. In turn, Google will be kicked off all AOL listings, to be replaced by MSN or some AOL-MSN mix of search results and advertisements.The executives at Google are making a major mistake, a critical blunder. Google will will <h4>beats by dre tour white</h4> will lose 10 percent of its business to MSN without MSN being required to expend any resources for the business. The Google Adwords program, the primary revenue source for Google, will no longer be on AOL. Surely Google could have come up with something more enticing to AOL or at

Answered at 12:44 on Monday 21 May 2012 by bettyjohn Answer Rating: Not Rated Yet.

Report this Answer

Do not give away serial numbers! Doing so will result in a ban without warning!